ࡱ> @Root EntrydO)НzMPowerPoint Document(dSummaryInformation(ADocumentSummaryInformation8D BA !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?CDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY( / 0DTimes New Romancv 0( 0DArialNew Romancv 0( 0" DWingdingsRomancv 0( 0 ` .  @n?" dd@  @@`` h`| #   0@87 uʚ;2Nʚ;g44d4dv 0ppp@ <4!d!d` 0Ltd<4dddd` 0Ltd? %  HUMANITY AND NATURAL LAW The sanctity/dignity of the human derived from natural law, itself based on the imago dei view of Homo sapiens Starting in the 13th century, natural law detached from its divine paternity, and humanity comes to be defined in an  inalienable species-specific way. However, even this  de-deified view of humanity still presupposed a species essentialism that Darwinism  and of course postmodernism  came to deny. Now  natural law tends to refer to an undifferentiated sense of nature s normative status (aka  ecology ), in which animals and even the land have  rights alongside humans. On the other hand, plans are also afoot for a species-shift out of humanity: Are  Converging Technologies a Trojan Horse for  transhumanism ? ZZ"R" " " """"*c"Pp$"SIX CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES AGENDAS: NORMATIVE FUTURES FOR HUMANITY ENHANCE: NSF/EU More productive normal lifespans PROLONG: Reverse age-related disintegration Immoraliism TRANSCEND: Natural Artificial Selection (J. Huxley) TRANSLATE: Silicon Resurrection, Avatars (Kurzweil) INCORPORATE: Universitas, Extended Phenotype, Supersized Mind TEST: Bio-Risk-taking protected by social insurance fEZZJZZE""" """"$" " " """ "+" "" "&""/"bo . b  ;H  ` f3f3` ff̙` ___` ff` 3ff3f>?" dd@,?lPd@   Z l<@ d`"  n?" dd@   @@``@n?" dd@  @@``PR    @ ` ` p>> H@ (  ^N y   "yZ  S B7 C DEHFPv @?q 6 6 n(dx  G b q %(@"B y2   `G1?"  T gֳgֳ ?"P  T Click to edit Master title style! !  TPgֳgֳ ?"``  >*  Tgֳgֳ ?"`   @*   Tgֳgֳ ?"`   @*$   0d "  RClick to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level!     S`  Hd޽h? ? f3f3 Soaring    (   N t   "tZ   S BsC5 DEHFPv @?3 r4 rv$[I_l3HxF 3 %(@" "2   C CRENGCJRQ1? `TO`TR`TO`TRR`TRR"t  Tgֳgֳ ?"/O  T Click to edit Master title style! !  T@gֳgֳ ?"pp   W#Click to edit Master subtitle style$ $  Tgֳgֳ ?"``  >*  Tgֳgֳ ?"`   @*  Tgֳgֳ ?"`   @*`  Hd޽h? ?  f3f3P   0p(  p p 6 \ , "  p <8xC  LATIN AMERICA AND THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY Latin America s Intellectual Trajectory: From Catholicism to Comtean Positivism without Protestant Reformation (Leopoldo Zea) Normative consequences: Weak liberal and individualist traditions but strong traditions of political corporatism and strong collective sense of humanity -- on both the right and the left, sacred and secular. Question: Is Latin American better placed to deal with redefinitions of the humanity in light of the  enhancement potential of the  Converging Technologies Agenda?  Bioliberalism : US and Europe so far gravitating to an  open borders approach to the human/non-human distinction, both scientifically and politically. * )"("Y""""""">h,  p S  nP    H p 0޽h ? f3f3  @t$(  tr t S JP   r t S & Pp   H t 0޽h ? f3f3  `|$(  |r | S P   r | S Lp 0   H | 0޽h ? f3f3r 00 'x0d2 P4:( / 0DTimes New Roman,e|dv 0|( 0DArialNew Roman,e|dv 0|( 0" DWingdingsRoman,e|dv 0|( 0 ` .Current User D՜.+,0    On-screen Show91Ӱƽed# Times New RomanArial WingdingsSoaringPowerPoint PresentationPowerPoint PresentationPowerPoint Presentation  Fonts UsedOh+'0`A px , L X d p|PowerPoint Presentation Steve FullereseMC:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Templates\Presentation Designs\Soaring.pot\ Steve Fullerles3evMicrosoft PowerPointoso@{y@@>@PzMG?g  g& &&#TNPPL2OMit & TNPP &&TNPP    &&--- $  $   $- $(( $(22( $2<<2- $<FF<- $FPPF $PZZP- $ZddZ $dnnd- $nxxn- $xx- $ $- $- $- $- $- $ $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $""- $",,"- $,66,- $6@@6- $@JJ@- $JTTJ- $T^^T- $^hh^- $hrrh- $r||r- $||- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $&&- $&00&- $0::0- $:DD:- $DNND- $NXXN- $XbbX- $bllb- $lvvl~- $vvz- $w- $s- $o- $l- $h- $d- $a- $]- $Y- $W- $S- $O- $L- $  H- $  D- $  B- $ ** >- $*44*:- $4>>48- $>HH>4- $HRRH0- $R\\R.- $\ff\*- $fppf&- $pzzp#- $zz- $- $- $- $ - $- $---&&&&6&--&&/v- $6@@6/w- $@JJ@0y- $JTTJ1{- $T^^T2~- $^hh^3- $hrrh4- $r||r6- $||7- $9- $;- $=- $?- $ A- $!C- $"E- $#H- $%J- $&L- $'N- $(Q- $)S- $*U- $+W- $&&,Y- $&00&-Z- $0::0.\- $:DD:.]- $DNND/^- $NXXN/`- $XbbX0a- $bllb0b- $lvvl1b- $vv1c- $2d- $2d- $2e- $2e- $2e- $3f- $&&&- &($s6Ws =p8KY%cIluqs&&-&& &&-&&($s6Ws =p8KY%cIluqs&&/v- $6@@6/w- $@JJ@0y- $JTTJ1{- $T^^T2~- $^hh^3- $hrrh4- $r||r6- $||7- $9- $;- $=- $?- $ A- $!C- $"E- $#H- $%J- $&L- $'N- $(Q- $)S- $*U- $+W- $&&,Y- $&00&-Z- $0::0.\- $:DD:.]- $DNND/^- $NXXN/`- $XbbX0a- $bllb0b- $lvvl1b- $vv1c- $2d- $2d- $2e- $2e- $2e- $3f- $&- --&&&v3f--F%!-Z 0,X9GWh{2Rq!=Z x.=KWa>ibnrs--&&&G&w@ ww @w3f- &Gy& --l(-- --@-- @Times New Romanww @w3f- .C2 P(LATIN AMERICA AND THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY    .@Times New Romanww @w3f- .2 Latin America   . . 2  . ..2 s Intellectual Trajectory:       .--  .$2 From Catholicism to     . .2 Comtean . .2  Positivism c   . .72 without Protestant Reformation (         . .2 j Leopoldo Zea    . . 2 ) . .(2 % Normative consequences       .( ( (.g2 %@: Weak liberal and individualist traditions but strong tradition               . (. 2 %s . (.g2 E @of political corporatism and strong collective sense of humanity                  . (. 2 E-- . (.(2 Eon both the right and        . (.32 e the left, sacred and secular.       . (.2  Question  . j j.g2 k@: Is Latin American better placed to deal with redefinitions of              . j."2 humanity in light     . j.2  of the n . j. 2 O- . j.2 X enhancementa    . j. 2 - . j.!2 potential of the    . j. 2 - . j.*2 Converging Technologies      . j. 2 - . j.2 Agenda?n  . j. 2  - . j.2  Bioliberalism  . j. 2 - .  .E2 ): US and Europe so far gravitating to an           . . 2 \- . .2 e open borders    . . 2 - . .2 approach to the    . .2 % human/non  . . 2 %--. .Z2 %7human distinction, both scientifically and politically.                .--"System3f !-&TNPP & Design Template Slide Titles$_c Steve FullerSteve Fullerr  @n?" dd@  @@`` h` #   0@87 uʚ;2Nʚ;g44d4dv 0pppp@ <4!d!d` 0,f<4dddd` 0,f? %  HUMANITY AND NATURAL LAW The sanctity/dignity of the human derived from natural law, itself based on the imago dei view of Homo sapiens Starting in the 13th century, natural law detached from its divine paternity, and humanity comes to be defined in an  inalienable species-specific way. However, even this  de-deified view of humanity still presupposed a species essentialism that Darwinism  and of course postmodernism  came to deny. Now  natural law tends to refer to an undifferentiated sense of nature s normative status (aka  ecology ), in which animals and even the land have  rights alongside humans. On the other hand, plans are also afoot for a species-shift out of humanity: Are  Converging Technologies a Trojan Horse for  transhumanism ? ZZ"R" " " """"*c"Pp$ "SIX CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES AGENDAS: NORMATIVE FUTURES FOR HUMANITY ENHANCE: NSF/EU More productive normal lifespans PROLONG: Reverse age-related disintegration Immoraliism TRANSCEND: Natural Artificial Selection (J. Huxley) TRANSLATE: Silicon Resurrection, Avatars (Kurzweil) INCORPORATE: Universitas, Extended Phenotype, Supersized Mind TEST: Bio-Risk-taking protected by social insurance fEZZJZZE""" """"$" " " """ "+" "" "&""/"bo . b  ;H  0p(  p p 6C< \ , "  p < <C  LATIN AMERICA AND THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY Latin America s Intellectual Trajectory: From Catholicism to Comtean Positivism without Protestant Reformation (Leopoldo Zea) Normative consequences: Weak liberal and individualist traditions but strong traditions of political corporatism and strong collective sense of humanity -- on both the right and the left, sacred and secular. Question: Is Latin American better placed to deal with redefinitions of humanity in light of the  enhancement potential of the  Converging Technologies Agenda?  Bioliberalism : US and Europe so far gravitating to an  open borders approach to the human/non-human distinction, both scientifically and politically. * )"("Y""""""">h, | p S H<P  <  H p 0޽h ? f3f3r4{F x4OD( / 0DTimes New Roman,e|dv 0|( 0DArialNew Roman,e|dv 0|( 0" DWingdingsRoman,e|dv 0|( 0 ` .  @n?" dd@  @@`` h` #   0@87 uʚ;2Nʚ;g44d4dv 0pppp@ <4!d!d` 0,f<4dddd` 0,f? %  HUMANITY AND NATURAL LAW The sanctity/dignity of the human derived from natural law, itself based on the imago dei view of Homo sapiens Starting in the 13th century, natural law detached from its divine paternity, and humanity comes to be defined in an  inalienable species-specific way. However, even this  de-deified view of humanity still presupposed a species essentialism that Darwinism  and of course postmodernism  came to deny. Now  natural law tends to refer to an undifferentiated sense of nature s normative status (aka  ecology ), in which animals and even the land have  rights alongside humans. On the other hand, plans are also afoot for a species-shift out of humanity: Are  Converging Technologies a Trojan Horse for  transhumanism ? ZZ"R" " " """"*c"Pp$ $SIX CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES AGENDAS: NORMATIVE FUTURES FOR HUMANITY ENHANCE: NSF/EU More productive normal lifespans PROLONG: Reverse age-related disintegration Immortaliism TRANSCEND: Natural Artificial Selection (J. Huxley) TRANSLATE: Silicon Resurrection, Avatars (Kurzweil) INCORPORATE: Universitas, Extended Phenotype, Supersized Mind TEST: Bio-Risk-taking protected by social insurance fEZZKZZE""" """"$"" " """ "+" "" "&""/"bo . b  ;  @|$(  |r | S P   r | S , 0   H | 0޽h ? f3f3rPa OcD